Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Previous | Next

C[omp]ute

Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Choochoo Training Diary

Last 100 entries

Surprise Paradox; [Books] Good Author List; [Computing] Efficient queries with grouping in Postgres; [Computing] Automatic Wake (Linux); [Computing] AWS CDK Aspects in Go; [Bike] Adidas Gravel Shoes; [Computing, Horror] Biological Chips; [Books] Weird Lit Recs; [Covid] Extended SIR Models; [Art] York-based Printmaker; [Physics] Quantum Transitions are not Instantaneous; [Computing] AI and Drum Machines; [Computing] Probabilities, Stopping Times, Martingales; bpftrace Intro Article; [Computing] Starlab Systems - Linux Laptops; [Computing] Extended Berkeley Packet Filter; [Green] Mainspring Linear Generator; Better Approach; Rummikub Solver; Chilean Poetry; Felicitations - Empowerment Grant; [Bike] Fixing Spyre Brakes (That Need Constant Adjustment); [Computing, Music] Raspberry Pi Media (Audio) Streamer; [Computing] Amazing Hack To Embed DSL In Python; [Bike] Ruta Del Condor (El Alfalfal); [Bike] Estimating Power On Climbs; [Computing] Applying Azure B2C Authentication To Function Apps; [Bike] Gearing On The Back Of An Envelope; [Computing] Okular and Postscript in OpenSuse; There's a fix!; [Computing] Fail2Ban on OpenSuse Leap 15.3 (NFTables); [Cycling, Computing] Power Calculation and Brakes; [Hardware, Computing] Amazing Pockit Computer; Bullying; How I Am - 3 Years Post Accident, 8+ Years With MS; [USA Politics] In America's Uncivil War Republicans Are The Aggressors; [Programming] Selenium and Python; Better Walking Data; [Bike] How Fast Before Walking More Efficient Than Cycling?; [COVID] Coronavirus And Cycling; [Programming] Docker on OpenSuse; Cadence v Speed; [Bike] Gearing For Real Cyclists; [Programming] React plotting - visx; [Programming] React Leaflet; AliExpress Independent Sellers; Applebaum - Twilight of Democracy; [Politics] Back + US Elections; [Programming,Exercise] Simple Timer Script; [News] 2019: The year revolt went global; [Politics] The world's most-surveilled cities; [Bike] Hope Freehub; [Restaurant] Mama Chau's (Chinese, Providencia); [Politics] Brexit Podcast; [Diary] Pneumonia; [Politics] Britain's Reichstag Fire moment; install cairo; [Programming] GCC Sanitizer Flags; [GPU, Programming] Per-Thread Program Counters; My Bike Accident - Looking Back One Year; [Python] Geographic heights are incredibly easy!; [Cooking] Cookie Recipe; Efficient, Simple, Directed Maximisation of Noisy Function; And for argparse; Bash Completion in Python; [Computing] Configuring Github Jekyll Locally; [Maths, Link] The Napkin Project; You can Masquerade in Firewalld; [Bike] Servicing Budget (Spring) Forks; [Crypto] CIA Internet Comms Failure; [Python] Cute Rate Limiting API; [Causality] Judea Pearl Lecture; [Security, Computing] Chinese Hardware Hack Of Supermicro Boards; SQLAlchemy Joined Table Inheritance and Delete Cascade; [Translation] The Club; [Computing] Super Potato Bruh; [Computing] Extending Jupyter; Further HRM Details; [Computing, Bike] Activities in ch2; [Books, Link] Modern Japanese Lit; What ended up there; [Link, Book] Logic Book; Update - Garmin Express / Connect; Garmin Forerunner 35 v 230; [Link, Politics, Internet] Government Trolls; [Link, Politics] Why identity politics benefits the right more than the left; SSH Forwarding; A Specification For Repeating Events; A Fight for the Soul of Science; [Science, Book, Link] Lost In Math; OpenSuse Leap 15 Network Fixes; Update; [Book] Galileo's Middle Finger; [Bike] Chinese Carbon Rims; [Bike] Servicing Shimano XT Front Hub HB-M8010; [Bike] Aliexpress Cycling Tops; [Computing] Change to ssh handling of multiple identities?; [Bike] Endura Hummvee Lite II; [Computing] Marble Based Logic; [Link, Politics] Sanity Check For Nuclear Launch; [Link, Science] Entropy and Life

© 2006-2017 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

[Bike] Lessons From 2 Leading 2 Trailing

From: andrew cooke <andrew@...>

Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 22:26:48 -0400

I've built three wheels using the 2-leading, 2-trailing pattern.  Last
week I damaged one of these wheels.  Here's my thoughts on what I can
learn from that.


When I started building wheels I wanted to use a distinctive spoke
pattern.  I was aware of the recommendations to use only Two-Cross
(2x) or Three-Cross (3x) designs, but it was difficult to find hard
data about the risks of anything else.  I settled on the 2-leading
2-trailing (2L2T) pattern because (1) it seemed conservative (not that
different to 2x), (2) worked with a 32 hole hub, and (3) I found a pro
wheelbuilder who had built some, and who felt it was OK for casual use
(not for "real downhill", but I wasn't planning on that anyway).

And my experience has, until now, born that out.  All the wheels have
stayed remarkably true and given no problems (two have around 4,000km
on them, each, mixed road and off-road).

However, this weekend I looked down and noticed a slight wobble in my
rear wheel between the chainstays.  When I examined the wheel I found
that one spoke was completely loose - the nipple was 3/4 unscrewed.
With more study (as I re-trued the wheel) I realised that the rim near
that point had dented "inward" (towards the hub) by several mm.  This
had allowed that particular spoke to go slack, leading to the loose
nipple and wobble.

This could, of course, have happened to any wheel, and before I look
at problems specific to the lacing pattern I will give the generic
details:

  o The rim was an Easton (now RaceFace) Arc 27 (650b).  This was a
    fairly new nodel when I bought it, with few reviews (that I
    remember).  Now, however, many of the reviews on ChainReaction are
    negative.  So the rim itself may take some of the blame.

  o The tyre pressure was low (22 psi in a 2.4 Conti XCross).
    However, the tube did not have an snakebite puncture - likely
    because it was latex.

  o I believe the damage occurred while descending El Arrayan.  That
    trail is easy enough to reach decent speeds, but has frequent
    rockier sections that can be violent.  Particularly on the rear of
    a hardtail.

Together these suggest that the rear hit a rock at speed, with low
pressure in the tyres, causing the rim to give.  A common scenario.


What does this have to do with 2L2T?  The loose spoke was one of the
uncrossed spokes in the design.  This has two implications:

  1 If the spoke had been crossed then possibly it would have stayed
    under enough tension to keep the nipple from coming loose.  This
    is the advantage of crossing - that it gives the spoke additional
    movement before becoming slack.

  2 The 2L2T design is (simplifying somewhat) "pulling the wheel
    square".  This implies that it has stronger (corners of the
    square) and weaker sections (the sides).  The damage occurred in a
    weaker "side".

Personally, I am inclined to believe the first of these may be
important, but the second seems to be a stretch.


Given all the above I am planning to build a replacement (using the
same hub).  I will use a Stan's Arch rim (Mk3 is 26mm internal width,
which is almost the same as the Arc) - this appears to have a better
reputation (but again is fairly new...).  I will also run the rear at
23psi.  Finally I will probably use a 2x pattern (2x rather than 3x
since the hub holes are likely marked at that angle).  I'm not sure
it's needed, but:

  o In all honesty, the pattern isn't noticeable once the wheel is on
    the bike (a few people notice the steel frame; no-one has ever
    commented on the lacing).

  o Point (1) above (crossing could have saved the nipple from coming
    loose) seems like a significant gain if this happens mid-descent.

  o I'm starting to think that the argument "you're not doing crazy
    stuff so it's OK" doesn't hold so much weight.  First, one tends
    to push limits (eg lowering pressure until the rim is damaged).
    And second, I suspect my riding is more extreme than the majority
    of riders (after all, most bike owners hardly ride), even if I
    tend to focus on the people who are better than me.

While I'm not convinced the lacing pattern caused the failure, it
could have contributed and it's annoying having the uncertainty.
Going with a standard pattern will make any future damage easier to
understand.

Andrew

Comment on this post