Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next

C[omp]ute

Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

C-ORM: docs, API.

Last 100 entries

[Link, Computing] Useful gcc flags; [Link] Voynich Manuscript Decoded; [Bike] Notes on Servicing Suspension Forks; [Links, Computing] Snap, Flatpack, Appimage; [Link, Computing] Oracle is leaving Java (to die); [Link, Politics] Cubans + Ultrasonics; [Book, Link] Laurent Binet; VirtualBox; [Book, Link] No One's Ways; [Link] The Biggest Problem For Cyclists Is Bad Driving; [Computing] Doxygen, Sphinx, Breathe; [Admin] Brokw Recent Permalinks; [Bike, Chile] Buying Bearings in Santiago; [Computing, Opensuse] Upgrading to 42.3; [Link, Physics] First Support for a Physics Theory of Life; [Link, Bike] Peruvian Frame Maker; [Link] Awesome Game Theory Tit-For-Tat Thing; [Food, Review] La Fabbrica - Good Italian Food In Santiago; [Link, Programming] MySQL UTF8 Broken; [Link, Books] Latin American Authors; [Link, Computing] Optimizatin Puzzle; [Link, Books, Politics] Orwell Prize; [Link] What the Hell Is Happening With Qatar?; [Link] Deep Learning + Virtual Tensor Machines; [Link] Scaled Composites: Largest Wingspan Ever; [Link] SCP Foundation; [Bike] Lessons From 2 Leading 2 Trailing; [Link] Veg Restaurants in Santiago; [Link] List of Contemporary Latin American Authors; [Bike] FTHR; [Link] Whoa - NSA Reduces Collection (of US Residents); [Link] Red Bull's Breitbart; [Link] Linux Threads; [Link] Punycode; [Link] Bull / Girl Statues on Wall Street; [Link] Beautiful Chair Video; Update: Lower Pressures; [Link] Neat Python Exceptions; [Link] Fix for Windows 10 to Avoid Ads; [Link] Attacks on ZRTP; [Link] UK Jazz Invasion; [Review] Cuba; [Link] Aricle on Gender Reversal of US Presidential Debate; {OpenSuse] Fix for Network Offline in Updater Applet; [Link] Parkinson's Related to Gut Flora; Farellones Bike Park; [Meta] Tags; Update: Second Ride; Schwalbe Thunder Burt 2.1 v Continental X-King 2.4; Mountain Biking in Santiago; Books on Ethics; Security Fail from Command Driven Interface; Everything Old is New Again; Interesting Take on Trump's Lies; Chutney v6; References on Entropy; Amusing "Alexa.." broadcast; The Shame of Chile's Education System; Playing mp4 gifs in Firefox on Opensuses Leap 42.2; Concurrency at Microsoft; Globalisation: Uk -> Chile; OpenSuse 42.2 and Synaptics Touch-Pads; Even; Cherry Jam; Lebanese Writer Amin Maalouf; C++ - it's the language of the future; Learning From Trump; Chinese Writer Hu Fayun; And; Apricot Jam; Also; Excellent Article on USA Politics; Oh Metafilter; Prejudice Against The Rurals; Also, Zizek; Trump; Why Trump Won; Doxygen + Latex on CentOS 6; SMASH - Solve 5 Biggest Problems in Physics; Good article on racism, brexit, and social divides; Grandaddy are back!; Consciousness From Max Entropy; Democrats; Harvard Will Fix Black Poverty; Modelling Bicycle Wheels; Amusing Polling Outlier; If Labour keeps telling working class people...; Populism and Choice; Books on Defeat; Enrique Ferrari - Argentine Author; Transcript of German Scientists on Learning of Hiroshima; Calvert Journal; Owen Jones on Twitter; Possible Japanese Authors; Complex American Literature; Chutney v5; Weird Componentized Virus; Interesting Argentinian Author - Antonio Di Benedetto; Useful Thread on MetaPhysics; RAND on fighting online anarchy (2001); NSA Hacked

© 2006-2017 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

Twitter Stats and Bots

From: andrew cooke <andrew@...>

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:43:39 -0400

This article -
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/statistical-probability-that-mitt-romneys-new-twitter-followers-are-just-normal-users-0/260539/
- is mildly interesting.

I wouldn't have bothered posting a link except that I don't understand how
they can be so confident about the results.  In particular, look compare the
two graphs and tell me which curve looks odd:

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/indegree_615.jpg
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/obamaindegree_615.jpg

The odd man out is the yellow/gold curve for Romney.  The other three look
vaguely similar.  Yet that is the control group!  So what this seems to show
is that Romney, Obama, and other people as popular as Obama have a certain
shape; and that other people as popular as Romney have a different shape.

And when you put it like that, a mechanism seems pretty obvious:

Obama is very well known.  People in his control group are also well known.
Well known people have a certain shape (peaked to the left).

People like Romney are not well known and have a different shape (peaked
centrally).

One explanation for this is that bots follow the most well known people (but
that's not important for what I am arguing here).

So there are two sets of people, with different curves: well known and
not-so-well-known.

And then we have Romney.  Who has recently become very well known.  He has had
a lot of press coverage.  And so might be attracting followers distributed
like Obama, but who is still early enough in the game to have a total number
of votes comparable to less popular people.

I thought this was obvious, but am having a hard time making clear what I
mean...

Basically, Romney is being mis-identified as belonging to the less-popular
group because he has few followers.  But in fact he is an early stage version
of the popular group.  From that perspective he should have a similar profile
to Obama, but with a reduced scale (similar distribution but fewer total
followers).


One more time:

There's no ab-initio reason for shape to follow total number, which is what
the analysis assumes.  Perhaps Romney is simple a scaled down Obama (scaled
down because he only recently became very famous), rather than comparable to
less popular people that happen to have the same number of followers (people
who have a different kind of follower profile, with a different shape curve,
and which only happen to have a similar number of followers to Romney by
chance).

I hope that was clear to someone!

Andrew

Comment on this post