| Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next

C[omp]ute

Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

C-ORM: docs, API.

Last 100 entries

Crypto AG DID work with NSA / GCHQ; UNUMS (Universal Number Format); MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses); Interesting Looking Game; Euler's Theorem for Polynomials; Weeks 3-6; Reddit Comment; Differential Cryptanalysis For Dummies; Japanese Graphic Design; Books To Be Re-Read; And Today I Learned Bugs Need Clear Examples; Factoring a 67 bit prime in your head; Islamic Geometric Art; Useful Julia Backtraces from Tasks; Nothing, however, is lost with less discomfort than that which, when lost, cannot be missed; Article on Didion; Cost of Living by City; British Slavery; Derrida on Metaphor; African SciFi; Traits in Julia; Alternative Japanese Lit; Pulic Key as Address (Snow); Why Information Grows; The Blindness Of The Chilean Elite; Some Victoriagate Links; This Is Why I Left StackOverflow; New TLS Implementation; Maths for Physicists; How I Am 8; 1000 Word Philosophy; Cyberpunk Reading List; Detailed Discussion of Message Dispatch in ParserCombinator Library for Julia; FizzBuzz in Julia w Dependent Types; kokko - Design Shop in Osaka; Summary of Greece, Currently; LLVM and GPUs; See Also; Schoolgirl Groyps (Maths); Japanese Lit; Another Example - Modular Arithmetic; Music from United; Python 2 and 3 compatible alternative.; Read Agatha Christie for the Plot; A Constructive Look at TempleOS; Music Thread w Many Recommendations; Fixed Version; A Useful Julia Macro To Define Equality And Hash; k3b cdrom access, OpenSuse 13.1; Week 2; From outside, the UK looks less than stellar; Huge Fonts in VirtualBox; Keen - Complex Emergencies; The Fallen of World War II; Some Spanish Fiction; Calling C From Fortran 95; Bjork DJ Set; Z3 Example With Python; Week 1; Useful Guide To Starting With IJulia; UK Election + Media; Review: Reinventing Organizations; Inline Assembly With Julia / LLVM; Against the definition of types; Dumb Crypto Paper; The Search For Quasi-Periodicity...; Is There An Alternative To Processing?; CARDIAC (CARDboard Illustrative Aid to Computation); The Bolivian Case Against Chile At The Hague; Clear, Cogent Economic Arguments For Immigration; A Program To Say If I Am Working; Decent Cards For Ill People; New Photo; Luksic And Barrick Gold; President Bachelet's Speech; Baltimore Primer; libxml2 Parsing Stream; configure.ac Recipe For Library Path; The Davalos Affair For Idiots; Not The Onion: Google Fireside Chat w Kissinger; Bicycle Wheels, Inertia, and Energy; Another Tax Fraud; Google's Borg; A Verion That Redirects To Local HTTP Server; Spanish Accents For Idiots; Aluminium Cans; Advice on Spray Painting; Female View of Online Chat From a Male; UX Reading List; S4 Subgroups - Geometric Interpretation; Fucking Email; The SQM Affair For Idiots; Using Kolmogorov Complexity; Oblique Strategies in bash; Curses Tools; Markov Chain Monte Carlo Without all the Bullshit; Email Para Matias Godoy Mercado; The Penta Affair For Idiots; Example Code To Create numpy Array in C; Good Article on Bias in Graphic Design (NYTimes); Do You Backup github?

© 2006-2015 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

Twitter Stats and Bots

From: andrew cooke <andrew@...>

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:43:39 -0400

This article -
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/statistical-probability-that-mitt-romneys-new-twitter-followers-are-just-normal-users-0/260539/
- is mildly interesting.

I wouldn't have bothered posting a link except that I don't understand how
they can be so confident about the results.  In particular, look compare the
two graphs and tell me which curve looks odd:

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/indegree_615.jpg
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/obamaindegree_615.jpg

The odd man out is the yellow/gold curve for Romney.  The other three look
vaguely similar.  Yet that is the control group!  So what this seems to show
is that Romney, Obama, and other people as popular as Obama have a certain
shape; and that other people as popular as Romney have a different shape.

And when you put it like that, a mechanism seems pretty obvious:

Obama is very well known.  People in his control group are also well known.
Well known people have a certain shape (peaked to the left).

People like Romney are not well known and have a different shape (peaked
centrally).

One explanation for this is that bots follow the most well known people (but
that's not important for what I am arguing here).

So there are two sets of people, with different curves: well known and
not-so-well-known.

And then we have Romney.  Who has recently become very well known.  He has had
a lot of press coverage.  And so might be attracting followers distributed
like Obama, but who is still early enough in the game to have a total number
of votes comparable to less popular people.

I thought this was obvious, but am having a hard time making clear what I
mean...

Basically, Romney is being mis-identified as belonging to the less-popular
group because he has few followers.  But in fact he is an early stage version
of the popular group.  From that perspective he should have a similar profile
to Obama, but with a reduced scale (similar distribution but fewer total
followers).


One more time:

There's no ab-initio reason for shape to follow total number, which is what
the analysis assumes.  Perhaps Romney is simple a scaled down Obama (scaled
down because he only recently became very famous), rather than comparable to
less popular people that happen to have the same number of followers (people
who have a different kind of follower profile, with a different shape curve,
and which only happen to have a similar number of followers to Romney by
chance).

I hope that was clear to someone!

Andrew

Comment on this post