| Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next

C[omp]ute

Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

Last 100 entries

Causal Consistency; The Quest for Randomness; Chat Wars; Real-life Financial Co Without ACID Database...; Flexible Muscle-Based Locomotion for Bipedal Creatures; SQL Performance Explained; The Little Manual of API Design; Multiple Word Sizes; CRC - Next Steps; FizzBuzz; Update on CRCs; Decent Links / Discussion Community; Automated Reasoning About LLVM Optimizations and Undefined Behavior; A Painless Guide To CRC Error Detection Algorithms; Tests in Julia; Dave Eggers: what's so funny about peace, love and Starship?; Cello - High Level C Programming; autoreconf needs tar; Will Self Goes To Heathrow; Top 5 BioInformatics Papers; Vasovagal Response; Good Food in Vina; Chilean Drug Criminals Use Subsitution Cipher; Adrenaline; Stiglitz on the Impact of Technology; Why Not; How I Am 5; Lenovo X240 OpenSuse 13.1; NSA and GCHQ - Psychological Trolls; Finite Fields in Julia (Defining Your Own Number Type); Julian Assange; Starting Qemu on OpenSuse; Noisy GAs/TMs; Venezuela; Reinstalling GRUB with EFI; Instructions For Disabling KDE Indexing; Evolving Speakers; Changing Salt Size in Simple Crypt 3.0.0; Logarithmic Map (Moved); More Info; Words Found in Voynich Manuscript; An Inventory Of 3D Space-Filling Curves; Foxes Using Magnetic Fields To Hunt; 5 Rounds RC5 No Rotation; JP Morgan and Madoff; Ori - Secure, Distributed File System; Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs); Prejudice on Reddit; Recursion OK; Optimizing Julia Code; Cash Handouts in Brazil; Couple Nice Music Videos; It Also Works!; Adaptive Plaintext; It Works!; RC5 Without Rotation (2); 8 Years...; Attack Against Encrypted Linux Disks; Pushing Back On NSA At IETF; Summary of Experimental Ethics; Very Good Talk On Security, Snowden; Locusts are Grasshoppers!; Vagrant (OpenSuse and IDEs); Interesting Take On Mandela's Context; Haskell Cabal O(n^2) / O(n) Fix; How I Am 4; Chilean Charity Supporting Women; Doing SSH right; Festival of Urban Intervention; Neat Idea - Wormholes Provide Entanglement; And a Link....; Simple Encryption for Python 2.7; OpenSuse 13.1 Is Better!; Little Gain...; More Details on Technofull Damage; Palmrest Cracked Too....; Tecnofull (Lenovo Support) Is Fucking Useless; The Neuroscientist Who Discovered He Was a Psychopath; Interpolating Polynomials; Bottlehead Crack as Pre-amp; Ooops K702!; Bottlehead Crack, AKG K701; Breaking RC5 Without Rotation; Great post thank you; Big Balls of Mud; Phabricator - Tools for working together; Amazing Julia RC5 Code Parameterized By Word Size; Chi-Square Can Be Two-Sided; Why Do Brits Accept Surveillance?; Statistics Done Wrong; Mesas Trape from Bravo; European Report on Crypto Primitives and Protocols; Interesting Omissions; Oryx And Crake (Margaret Atwood); Music and Theory; My Arduino Programs; Elliptic Curve Crypto; Re: Licensing Interpreted Code; Licensing Interpreted Code; ASUS 1015E-DS03 OpenSuse 12.3 SSD; translating lettuce feature files into stub steps files

© 2006-2013 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

StackOverflow and "Show your work"

From: andrew cooke <andrew@...>

Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:01:32 -0300

Sometimes (I am not sure exactly why, and I am not sure I want to know, since
I suspect it is related to needs I would rather not admit to) I spend time on
StackOverflow.

StackOverflow is a strange place and I find some users frustrating.

Including:

 a people who ask questions that are not very interesting;
 b people who phrase questions so poorly that you need to expend considerable 
   effort to understand what is needed;
 c people who argue for their own confused view of the world, rather than
   tring to understand what is important in the answer given;
 d people who ask questions so simple that is hard to imagine how anyone 
   could have difficulty with them (homework questions, particularly);
 e people who confuse their opinion with fact (particularly bad with smart 
   people whose facts are correct, as they then assume that their opinions 
   are equally solid);
 f people who react to (d) by requesting that "effort is shown".

The last is worst of all.  I do understand the annoyance with (d) - it seems
somehow unfair that stupid or lazy people should have their homework done by
others.  But really, it's not so bad - at some point these people become
irrelevant: they are learning (I do not claim to understand how every person
learns - maybe asking dumb questions is useful for them), or going to leave
the industry, or will fail miserably at some later point.  So simply answer
the question if it looks like fun; there's no moral responsibility to
castigate them and there's certainly no compunction to somehow force them to
learn (quite the reverse - it seems much more just, to me, to feed them easy
answers now, because future failure will be all the harder).

And, worse still, (f) seems to be spreading to all answers.  When an
established member of the site asks a question some people will demand to "see
what you have tried".  Maybe I am projecting terribly here, but it's hard not
to see these people trapped in the classroom, fighting desperately for
validation, believing the questioners rivals who will somehow get praise that
was justly theirs.  Eww.

Andrew

Re: StackOverflow and "Show your work"

From: Michiel Buddingh' <michiel@...>

Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:28:58 +0100

Haven't been on StackOverflow for ages, but your description of its
issues is spot on.  Another annoyance of mine (that I'm guilty of
myself at times) is "good advice".  "You don't want to implement a
checksum algorithm by yourself."  "Never use goto like this."
  Since this kind of advice is mostly sensible, it gets upvoted, but
it tends to completely ignore the possibility that the person who
asked the question is doing something for fun, or wants to learn
something by doing.  I also think these 'answers' are of poorer
quality, since they substitute reflexive community groupthink for
actual thought about the question.

-- Michiel

Re: StackOverflow and "Show your work"

From: andrew cooke <andrew@...>

Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:58:58 -0300

True; comp.lang.python is terrible for that.  It used to be a great group, but
the developers moved to python-dev, python became more popular, and it ended
up being a place to tell newbies how to do things "the python way".  Whichis
fine until you are curious about some obscure part of the language...

Andrew

Comment on this post