| Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next


Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

Last 100 entries

Chat Wars; Real-life Financial Co Without ACID Database...; Flexible Muscle-Based Locomotion for Bipedal Creatures; SQL Performance Explained; The Little Manual of API Design; Multiple Word Sizes; CRC - Next Steps; FizzBuzz; Update on CRCs; Decent Links / Discussion Community; Automated Reasoning About LLVM Optimizations and Undefined Behavior; A Painless Guide To CRC Error Detection Algorithms; Tests in Julia; Dave Eggers: what's so funny about peace, love and Starship?; Cello - High Level C Programming; autoreconf needs tar; Will Self Goes To Heathrow; Top 5 BioInformatics Papers; Vasovagal Response; Good Food in Vina; Chilean Drug Criminals Use Subsitution Cipher; Adrenaline; Stiglitz on the Impact of Technology; Why Not; How I Am 5; Lenovo X240 OpenSuse 13.1; NSA and GCHQ - Psychological Trolls; Finite Fields in Julia (Defining Your Own Number Type); Julian Assange; Starting Qemu on OpenSuse; Noisy GAs/TMs; Venezuela; Reinstalling GRUB with EFI; Instructions For Disabling KDE Indexing; Evolving Speakers; Changing Salt Size in Simple Crypt 3.0.0; Logarithmic Map (Moved); More Info; Words Found in Voynich Manuscript; An Inventory Of 3D Space-Filling Curves; Foxes Using Magnetic Fields To Hunt; 5 Rounds RC5 No Rotation; JP Morgan and Madoff; Ori - Secure, Distributed File System; Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs); Prejudice on Reddit; Recursion OK; Optimizing Julia Code; Cash Handouts in Brazil; Couple Nice Music Videos; It Also Works!; Adaptive Plaintext; It Works!; RC5 Without Rotation (2); 8 Years...; Attack Against Encrypted Linux Disks; Pushing Back On NSA At IETF; Summary of Experimental Ethics; Very Good Talk On Security, Snowden; Locusts are Grasshoppers!; Vagrant (OpenSuse and IDEs); Interesting Take On Mandela's Context; Haskell Cabal O(n^2) / O(n) Fix; How I Am 4; Chilean Charity Supporting Women; Doing SSH right; Festival of Urban Intervention; Neat Idea - Wormholes Provide Entanglement; And a Link....; Simple Encryption for Python 2.7; OpenSuse 13.1 Is Better!; Little Gain...; More Details on Technofull Damage; Palmrest Cracked Too....; Tecnofull (Lenovo Support) Is Fucking Useless; The Neuroscientist Who Discovered He Was a Psychopath; Interpolating Polynomials; Bottlehead Crack as Pre-amp; Ooops K702!; Bottlehead Crack, AKG K701; Breaking RC5 Without Rotation; Great post thank you; Big Balls of Mud; Phabricator - Tools for working together; Amazing Julia RC5 Code Parameterized By Word Size; Chi-Square Can Be Two-Sided; Why Do Brits Accept Surveillance?; Statistics Done Wrong; Mesas Trape from Bravo; European Report on Crypto Primitives and Protocols; Interesting Omissions; Oryx And Crake (Margaret Atwood); Music and Theory; My Arduino Programs; Elliptic Curve Crypto; Re: Licensing Interpreted Code; Licensing Interpreted Code; ASUS 1015E-DS03 OpenSuse 12.3 SSD; translating lettuce feature files into stub steps files; Re: translating lettuce feature files into stub steps files; A Tale of Two Psychiatrists

© 2006-2013 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

Reflections on First Consultancy Gig

From: "andrew cooke" <andrew@...>

Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:51:37 -0400 (CLT)

I finished my first job in the capacity of a "consultant" and have been
thinking about how it went (ie worrying over the problems).

Technically, things generally went well.  I perhaps didn't worry enough
(or early enough) about efficiency, but this is perhaps more a social
issue than a technical one: even if you know a system can be made quick
enough in later iterations, "it's slow" is an immediate reaction of anyone
who tries it.

The technical/social distinction continues to be misleading, because my
first social issue is also a technical one: that I didn't think about the
future of the system.  Who will maintain and run it?  And do they have any
interest in it succeeding?

Related to that, did I provide what the client wanted?  I am not sure I
did.  There was an existing application that looked very good, but had a
poor technical basis.  I developed a new system that provided the
technical infrastructure on which a replacement could be built (or to
which the existing system could be moved).  That's fine, technically, but
it would have been much better received, I think, if it had been
implemented as a progressive extension to the existing system.  An
adaptive approach like that would have had the following advantages:

- The final result would integrate the existing presentation layer, which
looked good.

- During development I would have seen "real life" loads from the upper
layer, which might have led to slightly different (efficiency related)
implementation choices.

- The process for supporting the existing system would have adapted
gradually to the new system.

So why didn't I do this?  One obvious reason is that it sounds like a lot
more work.  But it turned out that we had enough time to implement much
more than anyone originally hoped.  So, at least in retrospect, I could
have taken much longer - half the functionality, better received, would
have been a decent tradeoff.

Another reason is that there was both poor communication and a fear of
poor communication.  The approach sketched above requires good
communication, I think.  But perhaps pressing forwards would have improved
communication to the degree necessary?  It is hard to argue against the
alternative - that by striking out alone, I made communication even worse.

All above is particularly galling because, while I don't think I am the
world's greatest communicator, I do think I am aware of my limitations and
sensitive to the kinds of issues described above.  I was certainly aware
of problems half-way through, when we gained an extension for more work;
at that point I knew I was not involving the client, but had not grasped
the extent of the problem.

While my *internal* process might be described as agile - many small
cycles, code always close to deployable, etc - I failed to implement what,
to me at least, seems to be agile's greatest tool: client participation. 
And the key to client participation, in this case, would have been
adaption of the existing system.


Comment on this post