Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next

C[omp]ute

Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

C-ORM: docs, API.

Last 100 entries

Efficient, Simple, Directed Maximisation of Noisy Function; And for argparse; Bash Completion in Python; [Computing] Configuring Github Jekyll Locally; [Maths, Link] The Napkin Project; Credit Card Processing for Cat Soft LLC; You can Masquerade in Firewalld; [Bike] Servicing Budget (Spring) Forks; [Crypto] CIA Internet Comms Failure; [Python] Cute Rate Limiting API; [Causality] Judea Pearl Lecture; [Security, Computing] Chinese Hardware Hack Of Supermicro Boards; SQLAlchemy Joined Table Inheritance and Delete Cascade; [Translation] The Club; [Computing] Super Potato Bruh; [Computing] Extending Jupyter; Further HRM Details; [Computing, Bike] Activities in ch2; [Books, Link] Modern Japanese Lit; What ended up there; [Link, Book] Logic Book; Update - Garmin Express / Connect; Garmin Forerunner 35 v 230; [Link, Politics, Internet] Government Trolls; [Link, Politics] Why identity politics benefits the right more than the left; SSH Forwarding; A Specification For Repeating Events; A Fight for the Soul of Science; [Science, Book, Link] Lost In Math; OpenSuse Leap 15 Network Fixes; Update; [Book] Galileo's Middle Finger; [Bike] Chinese Carbon Rims; [Bike] Servicing Shimano XT Front Hub HB-M8010; [Bike] Aliexpress Cycling Tops; [Computing] Change to ssh handling of multiple identities?; [Bike] Endura Hummvee Lite II; [Computing] Marble Based Logic; [Link, Politics] Sanity Check For Nuclear Launch; [Link, Science] Entropy and Life; [Link, Bike] Cheap Cycling Jerseys; [Link, Music] Music To Steal 2017; [Link, Future] Simulated Brain Drives Robot; [Link, Computing] Learned Index Structures; Solo Air Equalization; Update: Higher Pressures; Psychology; [Bike] Exercise And Fuel; Continental Race King 2.2; Removing Lowers; Mnesiacs; [Maths, Link] Dividing By Zero; [Book, Review] Ray Monk - Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty Of Genius; [Link, Bike, Computing] Evolving Lacing Patterns; [Jam] Strawberry and Orange Jam; [Chile, Privacy] Biometric Check During Mail Delivery; [Link, Chile, Spanish] Article on the Chilean Drought; [Bike] Extended Gear Ratios, Shimano XT M8000 (24/36 Chainring); [Link, Politics, USA] The Future Of American Democracy; Mass Hysteria; [Review, Books, Links] Kazuo Ishiguro - Never Let Me Go; [Link, Books] David Mitchell's Favourite Japanese Fiction; [Link, Bike] Rear Suspension Geometry; [Link, Cycling, Art] Strava Artwork; [Link, Computing] Useful gcc flags; [Link] Voynich Manuscript Decoded; [Bike] Notes on Servicing Suspension Forks; [Links, Computing] Snap, Flatpack, Appimage; [Link, Computing] Oracle is leaving Java (to die); [Link, Politics] Cubans + Ultrasonics; [Book, Link] Laurent Binet; VirtualBox; [Book, Link] No One's Ways; [Link] The Biggest Problem For Cyclists Is Bad Driving; [Computing] Doxygen, Sphinx, Breathe; [Admin] Brokw Recent Permalinks; [Bike, Chile] Buying Bearings in Santiago; [Computing, Opensuse] Upgrading to 42.3; [Link, Physics] First Support for a Physics Theory of Life; [Link, Bike] Peruvian Frame Maker; [Link] Awesome Game Theory Tit-For-Tat Thing; [Food, Review] La Fabbrica - Good Italian Food In Santiago; [Link, Programming] MySQL UTF8 Broken; [Link, Books] Latin American Authors; [Link, Computing] Optimizatin Puzzle; [Link, Books, Politics] Orwell Prize; [Link] What the Hell Is Happening With Qatar?; [Link] Deep Learning + Virtual Tensor Machines; [Link] Scaled Composites: Largest Wingspan Ever; [Link] SCP Foundation; [Bike] Lessons From 2 Leading 2 Trailing; [Link] Veg Restaurants in Santiago; [Link] List of Contemporary Latin American Authors; [Bike] FTHR; [Link] Whoa - NSA Reduces Collection (of US Residents); [Link] Red Bull's Breitbart; [Link] Linux Threads; [Link] Punycode; [Link] Bull / Girl Statues on Wall Street; [Link] Beautiful Chair Video; Update: Lower Pressures

© 2006-2017 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

Enersis, Endesa, Rights Issue

From: andrew cooke <andrew@...>

Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:59:42 -0400

There's been a lot of news in the Chilean press recently about Enersis.  The
bare facts are here -
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/e6867bf8-d727-11e1-8e7d-00144feabdc0.html - but
there's no explanation of why there has been such a big fuss.

There's a bit more background at
http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2012/07/26/chile-enersiss-8bn-cash-call


To understand what's happening you need to understand what a rights issue is.

So pretend that I am a company worth a billion dollars.  I am a publicly
traded company with just 1 share (also worth a billion dollars) that you own.

And I want some money.  Maybe I want that money because I want to invest and
grow.  Or maybe I want it because I am in desperate financial trouble back in
Europe.

Either way, I decide to create a second share.  I offer this share to you for
another billion dollars.  Why would you buy it?  At first glance it seems like
an odd/crazy thing to do - you already own all the company.  Why would you pay
to buy it again?

But if you buy the share I will have a billion dollars in extra cash.  So I
will no longer be worth one billion dollars (assuming my previous value was
fair) - I will be worth two billion!  So you will have paid 2 billion for a
company that is worth 2 billion.  So you don't lose anything!  Assuming that
the shares are liquid (that you can easily find a buyer) you could sell one of
those shares and get your money back.

Meanwhile, I am going to be busy investing that money, making my company
better.  Which will make my value increase further.  Which will make you
richer (since the value of the shares will increase).  Profit!


That took me a while to get my head around.  But in summary it's a way for a
company to raise money from its shareholders so that it can grow while
providing some guarantees that the profits from that growth go back to the
people that provided the money.

And if everyone is happy with the numbers then it makes a lot of sense.
Because it doesn't really "cost" the investors anything - in return for their
money they get an equal value in shares.

But there are risks.  What if the company doesn't grow?  What if it wastes all
that cash?  What if the current value of the company isn't a fair reflection
of what it is worth?  What if the company is going to use that money to pay
debts it's been keeping secret?

The Chilean economy is in pretty good shape.  Europe (especially Italy and
Spain, where the parent company of Enersis trases - the one that is making
this offer) is in a mess.

As the FT notes in the second link above:

  The problem is that the valuation given to the assets looks rich – some 25
  per cent more than Barclays had estimated, Invernizzi said in her note. And
  shareholders have little power to stop the deal from going through as
  proposed. The capital increase plan only needs two thirds of the votes to
  pass; Endesa already has 60 per cent of them.

So the company was going to push through a deal that would hurt Chilean
stakeholders (particularly the large pension funds, particularly mine - and
they sent me and everyone else an email about this just last week).

So all hell broke lose.

Andrew

Regulator's Response

From: andrew cooke <andrew@...>

Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:10:34 -0400

And here's what happened:
http://blogs.ft.com/beyond-brics/2012/08/03/chilean-regulator-calls-foul-on-enersis-cash-call/

  On Friday Chile's securities regulator (SVS, for its initials in Spanish)
  put up a roadblock to Enersis’s novel plan for an $8bn cash call. [...]

  The SVS [regulators] made two requests that could make Enersis’s plan that
  much harder to pass. First, Coloma said that Enersis should get a new and
  independent (and presumably lower) valuation of the Endesa assets. And,
  second, the SVS said the deal should be approved by a majority of board
  members who don’t represent Endesa, not by a 2/3 shareholder majority.

Andrew

Comment on this post