| Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next

C[omp]ute

Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

Last 100 entries

Chat Wars; Real-life Financial Co Without ACID Database...; Flexible Muscle-Based Locomotion for Bipedal Creatures; SQL Performance Explained; The Little Manual of API Design; Multiple Word Sizes; CRC - Next Steps; FizzBuzz; Update on CRCs; Decent Links / Discussion Community; Automated Reasoning About LLVM Optimizations and Undefined Behavior; A Painless Guide To CRC Error Detection Algorithms; Tests in Julia; Dave Eggers: what's so funny about peace, love and Starship?; Cello - High Level C Programming; autoreconf needs tar; Will Self Goes To Heathrow; Top 5 BioInformatics Papers; Vasovagal Response; Good Food in Vina; Chilean Drug Criminals Use Subsitution Cipher; Adrenaline; Stiglitz on the Impact of Technology; Why Not; How I Am 5; Lenovo X240 OpenSuse 13.1; NSA and GCHQ - Psychological Trolls; Finite Fields in Julia (Defining Your Own Number Type); Julian Assange; Starting Qemu on OpenSuse; Noisy GAs/TMs; Venezuela; Reinstalling GRUB with EFI; Instructions For Disabling KDE Indexing; Evolving Speakers; Changing Salt Size in Simple Crypt 3.0.0; Logarithmic Map (Moved); More Info; Words Found in Voynich Manuscript; An Inventory Of 3D Space-Filling Curves; Foxes Using Magnetic Fields To Hunt; 5 Rounds RC5 No Rotation; JP Morgan and Madoff; Ori - Secure, Distributed File System; Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs); Prejudice on Reddit; Recursion OK; Optimizing Julia Code; Cash Handouts in Brazil; Couple Nice Music Videos; It Also Works!; Adaptive Plaintext; It Works!; RC5 Without Rotation (2); 8 Years...; Attack Against Encrypted Linux Disks; Pushing Back On NSA At IETF; Summary of Experimental Ethics; Very Good Talk On Security, Snowden; Locusts are Grasshoppers!; Vagrant (OpenSuse and IDEs); Interesting Take On Mandela's Context; Haskell Cabal O(n^2) / O(n) Fix; How I Am 4; Chilean Charity Supporting Women; Doing SSH right; Festival of Urban Intervention; Neat Idea - Wormholes Provide Entanglement; And a Link....; Simple Encryption for Python 2.7; OpenSuse 13.1 Is Better!; Little Gain...; More Details on Technofull Damage; Palmrest Cracked Too....; Tecnofull (Lenovo Support) Is Fucking Useless; The Neuroscientist Who Discovered He Was a Psychopath; Interpolating Polynomials; Bottlehead Crack as Pre-amp; Ooops K702!; Bottlehead Crack, AKG K701; Breaking RC5 Without Rotation; Great post thank you; Big Balls of Mud; Phabricator - Tools for working together; Amazing Julia RC5 Code Parameterized By Word Size; Chi-Square Can Be Two-Sided; Why Do Brits Accept Surveillance?; Statistics Done Wrong; Mesas Trape from Bravo; European Report on Crypto Primitives and Protocols; Interesting Omissions; Oryx And Crake (Margaret Atwood); Music and Theory; My Arduino Programs; Elliptic Curve Crypto; Re: Licensing Interpreted Code; Licensing Interpreted Code; ASUS 1015E-DS03 OpenSuse 12.3 SSD; translating lettuce feature files into stub steps files; Re: translating lettuce feature files into stub steps files; A Tale of Two Psychiatrists

© 2006-2013 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

Empty Loops in Regular Expressions

From: andrew cooke <andrew@...>

Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 09:04:14 -0400

Extended regular expressions (particularly) have empty transitions that can
occur in loops.  For example, (?(1)a) only matches "a" if group 1 exists, so
(?(1)a)* could be a repated matching od the empty string.

To some extent this is already avoided at compile time, by refusing to parse
things like a**, but there are many possible cases.  The problems for an
implementation are then:

- Whether to warn or reject such cases
- If not rejected, whether to try avoid infinite loops during evaluation

I am currently working on this with RXPY.  In general, I want to (i) provide a
safe system as a default, but (ii) allow the user complete control.  So it
seeems that two flags are necessary: one to disable compile time errors and
one to disable run time safety.

Implementation must also consider efficiency and ease of maintenance /
impementation.  It seems to me that many (but not all) cases could be
automatically rewritten to a safer version, but I don't currently have good
graph rewriting support (I talk about graphs here because the "opcodes" in
RXPY are nodes on a graph; the regular expression is "compiled" to a graph of
these nodes that is then "evaluated" against the input).

Since I do not have rewriting, and because that is not a complete solution
anyway, I need some other runtime scheme.  The best I have found so far is to
add additional nodes that "break" any dangerous loops.  A machine can then
verify that input has beenconsumed between each encounter with such a node.
This keeps almost all the cost to those expressions that need such a feature.

Also, the logic to generate these nodes can also be used to generate compile
time errors.  The graph API includes "consumer(lenient)" where lenient is a
boolean.  If lenient is true then consumer returns True except when a node (or
sequence of nodes) *cannot* consume input.  Repeating such nodes (or
sequences) gives a compile time error.  If lenient is false then consumer
returns True only when a node (or sequence) *guarantees* consumption (in all
cases).  This can be used to detect when to add the runtime check node (ie
when False).

This is not completely implemented, but an initial attempt is looking very
positive - "spinning" in empty loops is avoided at very little cost, and the
integration of logic for compile and runtime checks reduces the code / detail
required.

Andrew

Comment on this post